Abstract

The provision of environmentally friendly and reliable power is crucial for advancing healthcare, education, and stimulating local economic development in Nigeria. Thus, the study focuses on the design of reliable and efficient hybrid renewable energy using photovoltaic and wind turbines system for Oron communities. Studies have shown that hybrid renewable energy is a viable solution for both urban and rural electrification. The system is designed by considering various parameters such as: inverter rating, size of PV arrays, number of batteries, wind turbine and height. Hybrid Optimization Model Electrification Renewable (HOMER) software was used in the design to determine the optimum load and daily consumption rate required based on the data generated from NIMET and HOMER. The outcome of the energy system for Oron community is modelled to accommodate a peak load of 11111.56kW with daily consumption rate of 8900kW, and excess energy of 4300kW/ yr. This requirement is satisfied by 20 wind turbines height of 65m at 2.35m/s wind speed to generate 4500kW/yr and PV array of 88,715 panels of 350watts each. The total battery required is 89,535.7kwh and 13000 kW converters to meet load demands. This study therefore reveals a viable and cost effective method of providing stable rural electrification to overcome power outage in Oron communities.

Keywords

Hybrid renewable energy HOMER Wind/ Photovoltaic system

1. Introduction

The need for affordable, reliable and sustainable energy is of great necessity to human, since human activities depend on energy for various applications such as: cooking, lightings etc. Provision of this environmentally friendly electrification is crucial for advancing healthcare, education and stimulating local economic development. Nigeria as a country has been suffering from shortage of electricity, making its rural communities to be in total blackout [9]. A typical community that faced this scenario is Oron community. Majority of the individuals who reside in this rural region face limited supply of power for their daily activities from the national grid. Despite the effort of the Akwa Ibom State Government in connecting this remote area to the national grid, the energy supply is still not enough to meet their demands as supply comes in one or two days within a week.

This problem has made citizens to make use of conventional sources of generating electricity. Researchers and energy experts are exploring new alternatives to support the power that comes from the national grid and at the same time reduce the effects of using fossil fuels that cause environmental hazards [7]. The current alternative sources that can proffer solution to this epileptic power supply and environmental degradation include; solar, geothermal, wind, tidal, hydro power among others.

Oron community is located in a coaster area and it is blessed with abundant winds and solar energy but sunlight is not consistent throughout the year, giving room to hybrid renewable energy. These numerous available renewable energy sources make the community to be suitable for this study. Hybrid Renewable Energy System (HRES) combines two or more renewable energies sources to improves reliability on power generation [12].

Current studies have unveiled the efficacy of using HRES in rural and urban electrification in Nigeria and beyond. For instance, HRES for sustainable power supply was developed by employing wind and solar in Minna, Lokoja, Abuja, Markurdi, Ilorin and Jos [20]. The results revealed that the hybrid system was suitable and beneficial to standalone wind energy system and photovoltaic in Makurdi, Ilorin, Abuja, and Lokoja. In a similar case, Isiaka et.al (2019) also used HOMER 3.4.3 simulation tool for power generation in Bayero University, Kano. The output of the process unveiled that the renewable energy comprising of diesel generators, PV, wind turbine, are optimal in terms of reliability, economy and efficiency. The technical feasibility of an optimal hybrid renewable energy system, designed for the rural electrification of an off-grid community of Edem Urua, a remote village located in the southern part of Nigeria was also examined. Mathematical modelling method and energy resources such as solar, wind, diesel-generator and battery were employed. The simulation and optimization were carried out using the HOMER analysis tool. The results of the analysis revealed that three optimal system configurations; Solar/DieselGenerator/Battery-Bank, Solar/wind/Diesel-Generator/Battery-Bank and Solar/Wind/Battery-Bank were the most cost effective and technically preferred solutions [14].

In another development, Lanre et al (2023) solved the problem of power outage in healthcare centres of Agbalaenyi, Okuru-Ama, Ejioku, Doso, Kadassaka and Damare-Polo in Nigeria using solar, diesel and wind energy sources. The outcome of the investigation shows that the combination of solar and wind energy are cost effective. Nurudeen et al (2025) also combined two renewable energy sources namely; wind and solar energy in Kano municipal. Weibull distribution through the standard deviation method was applied for ten years data. The solar and the turbine generated 2.335 kWh and 1.104 kWh respectively.

Nevertheless, ([1]; [18]; [21]; [5]; [2]; [10]) also focused their designs on wind and photovoltaic system in order to provide stable power for rural dwellers. Consequently, the review shows that researchers have done their best by providing a reliable power for major cities in Nigeria without considering the rural communities like Oron, which suffers epileptic power supply from the national grid. Thus, this study focused on proffering solution to this problem by modelling a viable hybrid renewable system for this community.

2 Methodology

Materials

HOMER 3.4.3 simulation tool was used for the power generation. The system was designed using wind turbine, photovoltaic (PV) arrays with power converters and batteries. The battery functions as a backup unit and serves as a storage system.

2.1.1Project SiteInformation

Oron is one of the major cities in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria with an estimated population of 87,209. This comprised of five (5) communities namely; Eyo Abasi, Uya Oro, Eyetong, Idua and Iquita. Figure 1, shows the map of Oron local government, located between longitude of 8.26⁰E and latitude 4.80⁰N at the right bank of the lower Estuary of the Cross River [4]. It is located at a coastal region which is characterized by costal estuarine topography with creeks mangrove and general low-lying sometime undulating land. There are fewer tall obstructions such as trees, hill and mountains which allowed good exposure to sun light and wind speed.

Figure
Figure 1: Oron Map [4].

2.1.2 Meteorological Data: The data used for the area under study was gotten from Nigeria meteorological Agency (NIMET). The data employed include; wind speed and solar irradiance data.

2.1.2.1 Wind Speed Data

The data utilized was extracted from NIMET site, which has an annual average wind speed of 2.25m/s for three years and four months as revealed in Table 1.

Table 1: Average wind speed for Oron
YEARSMONTHS 2021Average wind speed in (m/s) 2022Average wind speed in (m/s) 2023Average wind speed in (m/s) 2024Average wind speed in (m/s)
January 2.530 2.540 2.530 2.510
February 2.590 2.530 2.590 2.490
March 2.430 2.590 2.430 2.390
April 2.020 2.430 2.020 2.060
May 2.360 2.020 2.360
June 2.380 2.360 2.380
July 2.500 2.380 2.500
August 2.300 2.500 2.300
September 2.080 2.300 2.180
October 1.770 1.870 1.960
November 1.860 1.960 1.880
December 2.150 2.080 2.060

2.1.2.2 Solar Data

Table 2 shows the solar resources data that encompasses the average daily global solar radiation and average clearness index by taking into account the effect of temperature throughout the year.

Table 2:Monthly average solar horizontal clearances index and radiance
YEARS/MON-THS 2021 Clear-ance Index Average daily Radia-tion(kWh/m2/day) 2022 Clear-ance Index Average daily Radia-tion(kWh/m2/ day) 2023Clear-ance Index Average daily Radia-tion(kWh/m2/ day) 2024 Clear-ance Index Average daily Radia-tion(kWh/m2/ day)
Jan 0.590 5.630 0.596 5.610 0.591 5.620 0.611 5.810
Feb 0.566 5.670 0.563 5.650 0.565 5.670 0.576 5.770
March 0.516 5.350 0.518 5.370 0.515 5.360 0.514 5.350
April 0.491 5.100 0.493 5.080 0.492 5.100 0.480 4.990
May 0.481 4.770 0.480 4.790 0.475 4.780
June 0.446 4.360 0.445 4.350 0.444 4.360
July 0.395 3.890 0.391 3.880 0.393 3.890
August 0.360 3.680 0.361 3.700 0.361 3.690
Sept 0.389 4.050 0.387 4.020 0.388 4.010
October 0.429 4.310 0.430 4.330 0.429 4.320
Nov 0.510 4.910 0.507 4.850 0.506 4.840
Dec 0.520 4.850 0.510 4.860 0.507 4.830

2.1.3System Load Data

Energy audit was carried out via questionnaire. Five hundred and twenty (8,621) questionnaires were used to gather information on the numbers of residential buildings, commercial buildings, schools, hospitals and health centers with their electrical appliances and ratings for the five (5) communities that make Oron nation.

2.2 Temperature Data

Table 3 unveils the temperatures of the selected site location.

Table 3: Temperature of the site location within EsukOron.
S/N MONTH 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
1 January 32.3e= 33.1e= 32.3e= 30.6e= 31.2e= 31.2e=
2 February 29.5e= 28.8e= 30.2e= 29.5e= 28.3e= 28.7e=
3 March 27e= 28.6e= 29. 8e= 27.7e= 28.4e= 28.6e=
4 April 27e= 27.6e= 27.7e= 27.6e= 27,2e= 27.6e=
5 May 26e= 25.5e= 26.5e= 26.4e= 25.6e= 26.6e=
6 June 25e= 26.5e= 25.9e= 26.5e= 25.8e= 26.5e=
7 July 24e= 25.2e= 24.8e= 24.6e= 23.3e= 24.7e=
8 August 24e= 24.6e= 23.5e= 24.7e= 23.8e= 24.5e=
9 September 25e= 24,5e= 25.5e= 24.1e= 25.6e= 25.4e=
10 October 25e= 27.5e= 25.5e= 26.5e= 26.5e= 25.5e=
11 November 29e= 28.5e= 29.1e= 28.2e= 27.5e= 27.6e=
12 December 30.3e= 29.2e= 28.4e= 29.6e= 30.1e= 29.7e=
  1. Methods

HOMER software was utilized to ascertain the operational strategy and optimal sizing of the system. This is achieved by making energy balance calculation in each hourly time step of the year. In each time step, HOMER compares the energy demand and calculates the energy that flow to and fro from each component of the system. The energy balance calculation is performed by HOMER for each system configurations that were considered. It then determines whether the configuration meets energy demand under the specified conditions, estimates the cost of installation and operates the system over the project life cycle. The hourly and daily load profile for the site under review is shown in Table 3 and Figure 2.

Table 3: Hourly load Profile for Oron
Hour Load (kW)
00 972.190
01 972.190
02 972.190
03 956.440
04 671.350
05 396.220
06 2627.630
07 2923.020
08 4394.590
09 4431.930
10 2064.180
11 1548.410
12 1906.660
13 2656.250
14 2563.350
15 1773.800
16 4965.130
17 7241.990
18 7804.160
19 8748.890
20 7804.160
21 7804.160
22 7804.160
23 5522.170
Figure
Figure 2: Daily load profile

2.2.2Sensitivity Analysis

This analysis was examined for each of the components that make up the HRES to ascertain the number of components required to meet up the load demands.

2.2.2Design of Solar and Wind System

i) Power for PV is determined by using equation 1:

P=〖Ins〗_t × A×Eff(pv)

Where:

P = power

〖Ins〗_t= insolation time

A = area of single PV panel

Eff(pv) = overall efficiency of the PV panels and converters.

ii) The overall efficiency is shown in equation 2:

Eff(pv)= e=2

Where:

H = annual average solar radiation on tilted panels.

P_R = performance ratio

iii) The numerical methods of wind energy

Wind energy density was used to measure the volume of the region's wind energy resources by using equation 3:

P=〖1/2 ρV〗^3

Where:

ρ = air density kg/m3,

V = is the wind speed (m/s).

The air density was also calculated by employing equation:

ρ=[1.276(1+0.00336T)]×[(P-0.378e)1000]

Where:

P = monthly average atmospheric pressure

T = monthly average temperature

e= absolute humidity

2. 4 EconomicData

The cash flow summary contains capital cost of N311,952,575,250.00, Replacement cost of N44,408,022,474.66, salvage cost N24,941,239,369.13 and operational and maintenance (O&M) cost of N10,916,416,546.01. This revealed that the system is designed to bring return of investment after 20 years.

3. Results and discussion

3.1Simulation output

The HRES for the Oron community in Figure 3 consists of primary alternative current load of 89,525.2 kWh daily, and a peak load of 11111.56kW. The HOMER software determines the best possible configuration for the hybrid renewable energy system.

Figure
Figure 3: HRES Model

The power consumption is unveiled in Table 4. The simulation process gave a primary load of 32,676,701 kWh per year and there was no deferrable and D.C load in the system. However, Table 5, also indicated that 4,315,059 kW/yr is an excess electricity energy generated. This value represents 8.99 % of total energy generated and will be used for an expansion when required.

Table 4: Yearly Power Consumption
Consumption kWh/yr Percentage (%)
AC primary load 32,676,701 100
DC primary load 0 0
Deferable loadTotal 032,676,701 0100

Table 5: The Quantity of Electricity Generated
Quantity kWh/yr Percentage (%)
Excess electricity 4,315,059 8.99
Unmet electric load 0 0.0
Capacity shortage 0 0.0

Table 6, revealed the electricity generated by each component. The generic flat plate generated (PV) 43,433,670kWh/year which represents 90.5 % while the Leitwind 77 generates 4,565,587kWh/yr which indicates 9.5 %.

Table 6: Energy generated by each component
Component kWh/yr Percentage (%)
Generic flat plate (PV) 43,433,670 90.5
Leitwind 77 (wind turbine) 4,565,587 9.5
Total 47,999,257 100

Moreover, Figure 4 represents the monthly electric power generation for Oron local government area.

Figure
Figure 4: Monthly electric power generation

3.2 Cost Comparisonof Hybrid, Grid and Household Generators

Table 7 shows the cost of energy consumption for three consecutive sources of energy for the year 2024 in Oron. The hybrid energy provides 24 hours, grid average of 2hours and 30 minutes, and household generator average of 4 hours throughout the year.

Table 7: Cost of energy consumption using hybrid energy, PHDEDC and Generator in the year 2024
Months Cost of HRES (N ) Cost of using grid (N) Cost of running generator (N)
January 2,644,884,741.03 129,220,746.09 45,206,179.24
February 2,512,639,653.76 127,654,431.01 44,302,057.97
March 2,380,395,128.35 127,915,494.54 43,397,936.69
April 2,248,151,263.26 210,302,124.22 44,703,471.13
May 349,654,590.90 126,610,226.47 43,849,765.98
June 1,983,662,890.64 125,305,966.43 43,387,936.69
July 1,586,930,305.90 126,349,179.46 42,945,876.06
August 1,586,930,305.90 123,999,706.85 43,171,906.38
September 1,983,662,890.64 126,610,226,47 42,719,845.74
October 1,983,662,890.64 127,654,431.01 43,036,284.88
November 2,248,151263.94 127,915,478.02 45,206,179.24
December 2,380,395,128.35 130,526,014.17 45,658,239.87
Total 23,505,998,392.89 1,528,676,271.26 528,098,272.28

3.3Comparative Analysis of Results Using Artificial Neural network (ANN)

The result obtained from the optimization using ANN, shows N 811.391 against N810.56 being obtained from HOMER as LCOE. Comparing the values demystified that the ANN result is close to 1, which depicts that the ANN performed better than HOMER. The results of the regression model from ANN gives 0.99961, 0.9994, and 0.9992 for training, test and validation processes respectively.

4. Conclusion

The study employed HOMER software in renewable energy modelling for Oron electrification. The results show a peak load of 11MW/h with daily consumption rate of 89525.21kWh and excess energy of 4,315,059kWh/ yr. This implies that the system requires 20 wind turbines, height of 65m at 2.35m/s wind speed, PV array of 88,715 panels of 350 watts each or array of 77,625 panels of 400watts are required. In addition, 89,535.7kwh batteries and 13000 kW converters are also needed for the renewable energy to meet load demands. The system ensured that there are no unmet loads and the excess energy is at acceptable minimum. Therefore, the study shows that HRES is fit for Oron communities when compared to other sources of power by considering the environment and its resources and the cost of installation.

References
  1. Adejumobi I. A., Oyagbinrin S.G., Akinboro F. G., Olajide M.B. (2011). Hybrid Solar and Wind Power: An Essential for Information Communication Technology Infrastructure and People in Rural Communities. International Journal of Recent Research and Applied Studies, 9 (1): 130 -138. DOI: 10.14741/ijcet/22774106/spl.4.2016.38
  2. Ajao K. R, Oladosu A. and Popoola T. (2017). Using HOMER Power Optimization Software for DOI: 10.4314/jast.v16i1-2.64779
  3. Cost Benefit Analysis of Hybrid-Solar Power Generation Relative to Utility Cost in Nigeria. International Journal of Recent Research and Applied Studies, 1(7): 96 – 102. DOI: 10.4314/jast.v16i1-2.64779
  4. Beulah I. O., Bassey E. A. and Ekong D. (2019). Effects of Urban Crime on the Economic Of Oron Urban, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria, Journal of Agricultural ,Environmental Resource and Management, 4(1): 426 - 437. DOI: 10.61090/aksujaeerd.2023.007
  5. Cheng L.I., Yang X., Hai-Guo H.E., Wang Z.H., and Tang W. (2016). Optimization Allocation DOI: 10.1109/cec.2016.7744133
  6. of Standalone Microgrid System Capacity Based on Complementary Characteristic of Wind and Solar. Chinese Journal on Renewable Energy Resources 28:109 – 115. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.860-863.271
  7. Dunmade I. S. (2002). Indicators of Sustainability: Assessing the Suitability of a Foreign DOI: 10.1016/s0160-791x(02)00036-2
  8. Technology for a Developing Economy. Technology in Society, 24(4): 461- 471. DOI: 10.1016/s0160-791x(02)00036-2
  9. Hachimenum, N.A. (2015). Impact of Power Outages on Developing Countries: Evidence From Rural Households in Niger Delta, Nigeria. Journal of Energy Technologies and Policy, 5(3):1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104882
  10. Hadi, N. A., Ateeb H., Yuhani P. W., Jubaer A., Kamyar M., San Chuin L., Zulkurnain M. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-9781-4_7
  11. (2021). Sizing and Economic Analysis of StandAlone Hybrid Photovoltaic-Wind System for Rural Electrification: A Case Study Lundu, Sarawak. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 4: 100-191. DOI: 10.1016/j.clet.2021.100191
  12. Isiaka, S., Musefiu A., and Isah M. ( 2019). Design, Simulation and Optimization of a Hybrid DOI: 10.1109/iceerp49088.2019.8956985
  13. Renewable Energy System for Bayero University, Kano Nigeria. International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, 67 (10): 73 – 80. DOI: 10.14445/22312803/ijctt-v67i10p113
  14. Kehinde, S. O., Kufre M. U., and Nseobong I. O. (2022). Design and Optimization of DOI: 10.9734/jerr/2023/v25i121055
  15. Hybrid Renewable Energy System for Rural Electrification of an Off-Grid Community. European Journal of Engineering and Technology, 10(1): 28 - 42. DOI: 10.14710/ijred.0.31316
  16. Lanre, O., Omowunmi M. L., Toyeeb A. A., James G. A., Kufre E. J. and Ahmad A. S. (2023) DOI: 10.9734/ajpr/2023/v13i4291
  17. Optimal Planning and Deployment of Hybrid Renewable Energy to Rural Healthcare Facilities in Nigeria. Energies, 16:1-24. DOI: 10.3390/en16217259
  18. Nnadi, D. B., Odeh C. I., and Omeje C. (2014). Use of Hybrid Solar-Wind Energy Generation for Remote Area Electrification In South-Eastern Nigeria. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa, 25 (2): 61- 69 DOI: 10.17159/2413-3051/2014/v25i2a2670
  19. Nurudeen, I., Abdullahi A., Henry D. L., Fortune V. R., Muhyideen A., and Salisu A. (2025). Design and Installation of a Solar and Wind Hybrid System n Kano State, Nigeria. American Journal of Energy and Natural Resources, 4 (1): 20 - 28. DOI: 10.54536/ajenr.v4i1.4157
  20. Ohijeagbon, O. D . Ajayi, O. O., Waheed, M. A., Enesi Y. S. , Festus A. O. (2019). Design of Optimal Hybrid Renewable Energy System For Sustainable Power Supply to Isolated-Grid Communities in North Central, Nigeria. 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Materials Processing and Manufacturing (SMPM 2019), Procedia Manufacturing, 35: 278 – 284. DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.05.040
  21. Zade, A. B. Asha G., Ku P.M. and Ganesh L. (2016). Hybrid Solar and Wind Power Generation With Grid Interconnection System for Improving Power Quality. 1st International Conference on Power Electronics, Intelligent Control and Energy Systems, 50 – 58. DOI: 10.1109/icpeices.2016.7853296