Mobile CPU Architecture Evolution: From Early Designs to Modern Power-Efficient Processors
The mobile phone is become an essential part of our everyday lives. The processor architecture of mobile phones has undergone substantial modifications due to technological breakthroughs, resulting in the transition from regular mobile phones of the 1990s to contemporary smart phones. Communication, performance, and low-power operation have a significant impact on the design and adoption of mobile processors over time. Mobile handsets now provide a plethora of data services, made possible by the shift from analogue to digital telephony. Processor architecture has grown far more intricate to accommodate these services. Generation after generation, mobile processors continue to expand at a dizzying rate. Examining different mobile phone processing architectures is the objective of this article.
We look at mobile CPU design from the beginning to the present and into the future in this study. We take a look at the ways that changes in mobile CPU designs have affected consumers, designers of hardware, and mobile devices as a whole. We take a look at how ten state-of-the-art mobile CPU designs that came out in the last seven years have changed over time. We detail the evolution of mobile CPU performance, power, energy consumption, and user happiness. To keep up with the power, performance, and energy gains required by mobile computing, specialized accelerators seem to be a viable alternative to desktop-like scaling, which is becoming increasingly difficult for mobile CPUs due to technological limitations. Based on our findings, there are various design considerations that should be made about the CPU's role in future systems on chips (SoCs) due to this paradigm change.
Miller, T. Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artif. Intell. 2018, 267, 1–38.
Kim, B.; Khanna, R.; Koyejo, O.O. Examples are not enough, learn to criticize! Criticism for interpretability. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 2280–2288
Doshi-Velez, F.; Kim, B. Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1702.08608.
Molnar, C. Interpretable Machine Learning. 2019. Available online: https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book/
Wachter, S.; Mittelstadt, B.; Floridi, L. Why a right to explanation of automated decision-making does not exist in the general data protection regulation. Int. Data Priv. Law 2017, 7, 76–99.
Ribeiro, M.T.; Singh, S.; Guestrin, C. “Why Should I Trust You?”: Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA, 13–17 August 2016; pp. 1135–1144.
Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Engineering and Computer Science

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.