Emerging WSN applications include a wide selection of traditional situations with many nodes. The messages are propagated through intermediate nodes, in order to ensure correct contact between the network nodes with the base station, so that a path has many connexions. Generally speaking, the nodes on the sensor network are distinguished by their minimal resources, so protocols must be used that not only guarantee connectivity but also conserve the most energy while maintaining scalability. Different protocols for routing wireless sensor networks have been suggested, however, reactive routing algorithms have been shown to be energy efficient and adaptable to wireless sensor networks. In this paper, under the OMNeT + + simulation platform, the performance of the reactive protocol will be tested, evaluating different scripts. In contrast to the supplementary responsive protocols stated in literature, the AODV protocol has been selected for supremacy in performance. The following parameters have been evaluated: the transmission rate of packets, average delays, overhead routing and energy usage. The findings show that AODV decreases its efficiency with the growth in the number of nodes. As a result, its usability limits the network scalability and the outcomes demonstration that the spatial distribution of nodes affects protocol performance. The standardised delivery shows the best outcomes for our particular works.
References
Khalaf, Osamah & Sabbar, Bayan & Osamah, Ibrahim. (2019). An Overview on Wireless Sensor Networks and Finding Optimal Location of Nodes. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience. 7. 1096-1101. 10.1166/jctn.2019.8134.
M. M. N. Aldeer, R. E. Howard, R. P. Martin, K. Alkadhimi and L. M. Kamarudin, "Towards harnessing Wireless Sensor Networks for supporting the development process in Iraq," 2016 IEEE Conference on Open Systems (ICOS), Langkawi, 2016, pp. 81-86, doi: 10.1109/ICOS.2016.7881993.
M. Udin Harun Al Rasyid, F. A. Saputra, Z. S. Hadi and A. Fahmi, "Beacon-enabled IEEE 802.15.4 wireless sensor network performance," 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communication, Networks and Satellite (COMNETSAT), Yogyakarta, 2013, pp. 46-49, doi: 10.1109/COMNETSAT.2013.6870858.
N. AlMansour and S. Alahmadi, "Secure Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing Protocol in WSN," 2018 1st International Conference on Computer Applications & Information Security (ICCAIS), Riyadh, 2018, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/CAIS.2018.8441991.
M. U. H. Al Rasyid, D. Prasetyo, I. U. Nadhori and A. H. Alasiry, "Mobile monitoring of muscular strain sensor based on Wireless Body Area Network," 2015 International Electronics Symposium (IES), Surabaya, 2015, pp. 284-287, doi: 10.1109/ELECSYM.2015.7380856.
T. Al-khdour and U. Baroudi, "An Entropy-Based Throughput Metric for Fairly Evaluating WSN Routing Protocols," 2007 IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols, Beijing, 2007, pp. 342-343, doi: 10.1109/ICNP.2007.4375872.
IEEE Approved Draft Recommended Practice for Routing Packets in IEEE 802.15.4 Dynamically Changing Wireless Networks Amendment to fully define use of addressing and route information currently in the standard - Amendment A," in IEEE P802.15.10a/D03, November 2018 , vol., no., pp.1-22, 25 Jan. 2019.
M. Udin Harun Al Rasyid, F. A. Saputra, Z. S. Hadi and A. Fahmi, "Beacon-enabled IEEE 802.15.4 wireless sensor network performance," 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communication, Networks and Satellite (COMNETSAT), Yogyakarta, 2013, pp. 46-49, doi: 10.1109/COMNETSAT.2013.6870858.
Javaid, Nadeem & Sharif, Abida & Mahmood, Anzar & Ahmed, Shafq & Qasim, Umar & Khan, Zahoor. (2012). Monitoring and Controlling Power Using Zig bee Communications. 10.1109/BWCCA.2012.107.
Hammoshi, M. & Sayed, Awny. (2014). an analysis for a cluster tree Zigbee topology. 64. 674-680.
H. Shabani, M. M. Ahmed, S. Khan, S. A. Hameed and M. Hadi Habaebi, "Smart Zigbee/IEEE 802.15.4 MAC for wireless sensor multi-hop mesh networks," 2013 IEEE 7th International Power Engineering and Optimization Conference (PEOCO), Langkawi, 2013, pp. 282-287, doi: 10.1109/PEOCO.2013.6564558.
A. Kumar, A. Sharma and K. Grewal, "Resolving the paradox between IEEE 802.15.4 and Zigbee," 2014 International Conference on Reliability Optimization and Information Technology (ICROIT), Faridabad, 2014, pp. 484-486, doi: 10.1109/ICROIT.2014.6798371.
D. Jung, J. Joung and H. Cho, "Restructing 802.15.4 MAC protocol's Superframe structure for energy and transmission efficiency," 2015 International SoC Design Conference (ISOCC), Gyungju, 2015, pp. 257-258, doi: 10.1109/ISOCC.2015.7401745.
G. Pekhteryev, Z. Sahinoglu, P. Orlik and G. Bhatti, "Image transmission over IEEE 802.15.4 and ZigBee networks," 2005 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Kobe, 2005, pp. 3539-3542 Vol. 4, doi: 10.1109/ISCAS.2005.1465393.
Farahani, Shahin. (2008). ZigBee and IEEE 802.15.4 Protocol Layers. 10.1016/B978-0-7506-8393-7.00003-0.
G. Pekhteryev, Z. Sahinoglu, P. Orlik and G. Bhatti, "Image transmission over IEEE 802.15.4 and ZigBee networks," 2005 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Kobe, 2005, pp. 3539-3542 Vol. 4, doi: 10.1109/ISCAS.2005.1465393.
Maurya, Smriti & Barwar, Nemi. (2015). Performance Evaluation of AODV and DSDV Routing Protocols over Zigbee Network for Different Topologies under CBR Traffic Pattern. International Journal of Computer Applications. 124. 5-12. 10.5120/ijca2015905640.
Huang, Renwei & Nie, Zedong & Duan, Changjiang & Liu, Yuhang & Jia, Liya & Wang, Lei. (2015). Analysis and Comparison of the IEEE 802.15.4 and 802.15.6 Wireless Standards Based on MAC Layer. 9085. 7-16. 10.1007/978-3-319-19156-0_2.
Zayani, Mohamed-Haykel & Gauthier, Vincent & Zeghlache, Djamal. (2012). A Joint Model for IEEE 802.15.4 Physical and Medium Access Control Layers. 10.1109/IWCMC.2011.5982651.
Basmer, Thomas & Schomann, Henry & Peter, Steffen. (2011). Implementation analysis of the IEEE 802.15. 4 MAC for wireless sensor networks. 10.1109/iCOST.2011.6085840.
Kumar B R, Dr.Arun. (2013). Performance Analysis of DSR, AODV and DYMO Protocols, Quality of Service Issues and Security in MANET. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT),Vol. 2 Issue 11, November - 2013, 1208-1213
Gupta, Anuj & Kaur, Jatinder & Kaur, Sandeep. (2011). Comparison of DYMO, AODV, DSR and DSDV MANET routing protocols over varying traffic. International Journal of Research in Engineering & Applied Science. 1. 71-83.
Kaur, Sandeep & Gupta, Anuj. (2012). A Comparative analysis of AODV, DSR & DYMO reactive routing protocols for MANETs. M.Tech. Thesis.
Sharma, Lakhan & Roberts, Nirmal. (2012). Effects of Velocity on Performance of DYMO, AODV and DSR Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad-hoc Networks. Procedia Technology. 4. 727-731. 10.1016/j.protcy.2012.05.118.
Khalaf, Murad & Mohsin, Bassam. (2019). Analysis and simulation of three MANET routing protocols: A research on AODV, DSR & DSDV characteristics and their performance evaluation. 7. 1228-1238. 10.21533/pen.v7i3.717.g393.
Al Salam, Mohammed & Abdullah, Mahmood & Sabri, Rooa. (2014). AODV Protocol Improvement using Intelligent Clustering. International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887). 88. 6-13. 10.5120/15362-3839.
Atto, Muhsin & Mstafa, Ramadhan & Alkhayyat, Ahmed. (2020). Improving AODV Routing Protocol for Image Transmission Over Mobile Video Sensor Networks. IEEE Access. 8. 169396 - 169407. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3024093.
Alani, Haider & Abdelhaq, Maha & Alsaqour, Raed. (2020). Dynamic routing discovery scheme for high mobility in mobile ad hoc wireless networks. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE). 10. 3702. 10.11591/ijece.v10i4.pp3702-3714.
Al-Areeqi, Waheb & Ismail, Mahamod & Nordin, Rosdiadee & Arif, A.. (2017). Power-efficient routing schemes for MANETs: a survey and open issues. Wireless Networks. 6. 1917-1952. 10.1007/s11276-016-1263-6.
Abdala, Mohammed & Aswad, Rasha. (2015). Analysing Routing Protocols Performance in VANET Using 802.11p and 802.11g. International Journal of Computer Science Engineering and Technology (IJCSET). 5. 6-12.
Al-Kashoash, Hayder & Al-Nidawi, Yaarob & Kemp, Andrew. (2016). Congestion Analysis for Low Power and Lossy Networks. 10.1109/WTS.2016.7482027.
Al-Janabi, Sufyan & Yaseen, Yaseen. (2011). Performance Evaluation of AODV and DSDV Routing Protocols Using CityMob in VANETs. i-manager’s Journal on Communication Engineering and Systems (JCS). 1. 1-10. 10.26634/jcs.1.1.1726.
Ngo, Khoa & Huynh, Trong & Huynh, De. (2018). Simulation Wireless Sensor Networks in Castalia. 39-44. 10.1145/3193063.3193066.
Kumar, Vineet & Paulus, Rajeev & Agrawal, Aditi & Agrawal, Neelesh. (2018). Simulation based Analysis of AODV Routing Protocol in Ad Hoc Network under different Mobility and Propagation Loss Models using NS-3. International Journal of Computer Applications. 181. 22-26. 10.5120/ijca2018917506.
White, Preston & Ingalls, Ricki. (2009). Introduction to Simulation... Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference. 12-23. 10.1109/WSC.2009.5429315.
Ngo, Van-Vuong & Jang, Jaeshin. (2016). Performance Evaluation of a New AODV Protocol with Auxiliary Metrics. Journal of information and communication convergence engineering. 14. 14-20. 10.6109/jicce.2016.14.1.014.
Luaay abdlwahed shihab,(2013 ), Using Nano Bridge Point to Point Protocol, INDIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH, Volume : 3 | Issue : 11 | Nov 2013 | ISSN - 2249-555X.
Luaay Abdulwahed Shihab, 9 2015 ) , THE MECHANISM OF CONGESTION BETWEEN THE SERVER AND CLIENTS IN A LOCAL AREA NETWORK SOLUTIONS, International Journal of Civil Engineering, Construction and Estate Management, Vol.3, No.3, pp.63-68, August 2015.
