Ijecs Pages

Dr. Dinesh Soulanki

Valley International

LIG 73 Megdoot nagar mandsaur 

(M.P.) India 458001

Contact : +928226024694\

www,ijecs.in

Mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Impact Factor 

Year 2015 : 1.94 

Year 2016 : 2.38

Note: Current Value is predicted by using IJECS Citation Report Manager + Google Scholar Citation report

Impact Factor is calculated by ISI (Thomson Reuters), current value is calculated by reports of various online resource like Google Scholar, IJECS Citation Report Manager etc, so actual value may vary.

Authors:

IJECS

International Journal Of Engineering And Computer Science regards plagiarism as a very serious offence. It is an illegal form of copying. 

Plagiarism is defined as the unacknowledged use of the work of others as if this were your own original work.

Examples of plagiarism: 

  • Copying and pasting from the Internet and posting somewhere else without proper citation
  • Putting your name on another person’s essay or project
  • Copying exact wording from another person’s text
  • Using another person’s photo, diagram, tables, sounds, or ideas without proper citation
  • Presenting research in your own words without providing references
  • Purchasing another person’s text and using it as your own
  • Presenting ideas in the same format and order as your research source

 

By submitting paper for publication to the journal, Author(s) certify that : 

  • I/We are fully aware that plagiarism is wrong
  • I/We know that plagiarism is the use of another person’s idea or published work and to pretend that it is one’s own.
  • I/ We declare that each contribution to your project from the work(s) of other peoples published works or unpublished sources have been acknowledged and source of information have been referenced.
  • I/We certify that you are solely responsible for any incomplete reference that may remain in my/our work.

Anti-plagiarism declaration:

         I have read and understood the IJECS rules on plagiarism. I hereby declare that this piece of written work is the result of my own independent scholarly work, and that in all cases material   from the work of others (in books, articles, essays, dissertations, and on the internet)is acknowledged, and quotations and paraphrases are clearly indicated. No material other than that listed has been used. This written work has not previously not yet been published.

IJECS PUBLISHING ETHICS AND RECTITUDE

The publication of IJECS involves conscientious, systematic and comprehensive processes by publishers and editors which require to be dealt with efficiently and competently. To maintain high ethical standards of publication of quality science the publisher strives to work closely at all times with journal editors, authors and peer-reviewers. The ethics statement for IJECS journal is based on those by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Code of Conduct guidelines available at www.publicationethics.org.

The essentials of IJECS publishing ethics for all groups involved in the publishing process are as follows:

IJECS Editors’ Responsibilities

  • The editor of a journal holds a vital position taking important editorial decisions on all peer-reviewed submitted for publication.
  • The editor should maintain the transparency of the academic research & record, preclude professional needs from cooperating ethical standards, and always be willing to publish retractions, rectifications, and erratum when required.
  • The editor should assess manuscripts for their scientific quality and intellectual content, free from any sort of biased decisions based on discrimination of race, gender, geographical origin, or religion of the author(s). The editor should evaluate manuscripts objectively based on their academic merit free of any commercial or self-interests.
  • The editor should not disclose any information on submitted manuscripts before publication of the manuscript.
  • Promoting research rectitude must be preserved. If at any stage the publisher suspects any kind of misconduct in research, it should be investigated promptly in detail with suitable authority; and if any suspicious act of misconduct is observed in the peer review, it should be resolved with diligence.

IJECS Reviewers’ Responsibilities

  • Providing a detailed, constructive, and unbiased evaluation in a timely manner on the scientific content of the work.
  • Indicating whether the writing is relevant, concise & clear and evaluating the originality and scientific accuracy.
  • Maintaining the confidentiality of the complete review process.
  • Notifying the journal editor about any financial or personal conflict of interest and declining to review the manuscript when a possibility of such a conflict exists.
  • Notifying the journal editor of any ethical concerns in their evaluation of submitted manuscripts; such as any violation of ethical treatment of animal or human subjects or any considerable similarity between the previously published article and any reviewed manuscript.

Authors’ Responsibilities

  • All the work reported in the manuscript must be original and free from any kind of plagiarism.
  • The work should not have been published elsewhere or submitted to any other journal(s) at the same time.
  • Any potential conflict of interest must be clearly acknowledged.
  • Proper acknowledgements to other work reported (individual/company/institution) must be given. Permission must be obtained from any content used from other sources.
  • Only those who have made any substantial contribution to the interpretation or composition of the submitted work, should be listed as ‘Authors’. While other contributors should be mentioned as ‘co-authors’.

Publishers’ Responsibilities

  • IJECS is committed to work with journal editors, defining clearly their relevant roles, in order to ensure appropriate decisions regarding publication procedures and maintaining the transparency of editorial decisions.
  • IJECS ensures the integrity autonomy and originality of each published article with respect to:
    • publication and research fundings
    • publication ethics and rectitude
    • conflicts of interest
    • confidentiality
    • authorship
    • article modifications
    • timely publication of content.

 

 

 

Reviewer policy

It is an objective process at the heart of good scholarly publishing and is carried out on all reputable scientific journals. Our referees therefore play a vital role in maintaining the high standards of [Journal] and all manuscripts are peer reviewed following the procedure outlined below.

Initial manuscript evaluation

The Editor first evaluates all manuscripts. It is rare, but it is entirely feasible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Those that meet the minimum criteria are passed on to at least 2 experts for review. Authors of manuscripts rejected at this stage will be informed.

Type of Peer Review

Journal employs single blind review, where the reviewer remains anonymous throughout the process/ double blind reviewing, where both the reviewer and author remain anonymous throughout the process / open reviewing were both the reviewer and author are known to one another.

How the reviewer is selected

Reviewers are matched to the paper according to their expertise. We welcome suggestions for reviewers from the author though these recommendations may or may not be used.

Reviewer reports

Reviewers are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript :

  • Is original
  • Is practically sound
  • Follows appropriate ethical guidelines
  • Has results which are clearly presented and support the conclusions
  • Correctly references previous relevant work

Reviewers are not expected to correct or copyedit manuscripts. Language correction is not part of the peer review process.

Final report

A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the reviewers, and may include strict comments by the reviewers.

Editor’s Decision is final

Reviewers advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article.


Publication Process of IJECS

The Publication Process Is Consisting With The Following Steps. The Ultimate Objectives Of This Process Are Quality. 

1. After Receiving The Manuscript We Will Send A Submission Of Acknowledgement E-Mail   to The Author.

2. Manuscripts Will Be Checked By Plagiarism Checker Software.

3. Primary Quality Will Be Checked By The Editor.

4. The Manuscript Will Be Sent For Double Blinded Review.

5. Based On The Double Blinded Review Editor Will Take Decision And The Decision Will Be Communicated To The Author. Decisions Can Be Three Types Like Accepted Without Revision, Resubmit With Major/Minor Revisions, Rejected.

  1. After The Final Review Process If The Paper Will Accepted We Will Send A Payment Request To The Author.
  2. Author Need to Deposit Publication Fee after the Payment Request.
  3. after submission of copyright and fee article will publish

 

GettyImages.pngace.pngajdh.pngarx.pngcit.pngcomp.pngcross.pngicn.pngino.pnglogo_wcmasthead_en.pngres.pngresbib.pngsci.pngscic.pngscics.pngsearch_logo.gifulrich.pngur.png

FaceBook

facebook likebox joomla module

About Us

The“International Journal of Engineering  and computer science”(IJECS™) is an international online journal in English published monthly. The aim of IJECS is to publish peer reviewed research and review articles in rapidly developing field of engineering science and technology

Address

Address : LIG 73 megdoot Nagar Mandsaur

State : Madhya Pradesh

Country : INDIA

Phone :+91 (822) 260 24 694

Email: editor@ijecs.in

Go to top